SIX REASONS TO HOLD AN INQUEST

This is the letter from Commissioner of Police to DPP in August 2012 reporting on the result of the police reinvestigation.

Here are six VALID reasons why this material needs to go before a Coroner to determine the way forward in this matter.

  1. This evidence needs to be tested in a court. “The last credible sighting of Leanne Holland occurred at about 10.15am on 23 September 1991.” In fact, the last CREDIBLE sighting was by a family friend of the Hollands who had known Leanne since she was a baby. He saw her at 3pm on 23 Setpember 1991.
  2. This evidence needs to be tested in a court. Was the peroxide put in her hair on Monday 23 September 1991 or some earlier date. The evidence has always been that she wanted to dye her hair not bleach it; her hair was already blond.
  3. This evidence needs to be tested in a court. I have already heard varying reports as to the quantity of blood  found on the shower curtain and whether it belonged to Leanne.
  4. This evidence needs to be tested in a court. At least two experts have provided statements that if the body had been in the boot of that car there would have been smell and a LOT of blood. Neither of which was evident.
  5. This evidence needs to be tested in a court. A scientific officer investigating a murder, sights a maggot in the boot but does not make note of it, film it or video it. A student previously unknown to be at the scene on work experience makes note of it. The officer finds the maggot alive 24 hrs later, still in the boot. Three of his peers give statements that what he has stated is scientifically impossible. To confuse matters the officer mixes up the labeling of exhibits, marking this exhibit as found after the maggots at the scene, instead of before.
  6. This evidence needs to be tested in a court. “Entomological evidence has determined the approximate date of death as 23 September 1991″. Other entomological evidence determined the time of death as absolutely on 24 September 1991.

23 Aug 2012. COP letter to DPP

 

4 thoughts on “SIX REASONS TO HOLD AN INQUEST

  1. In the interest of justice there should be an independent judicial review or a coronial inquest or a royal commission into the death of Leanne Holland

    Like

  2. Yes I think an independent Coronial Inquest would be beneficial to all parties concerned including the general public. They have all suffered enough and this matter needs to be laid to rest once and for all so the families can move on with their lives without the speculation surrounding this matter. Leanne Holland also needs to rest in peace. None of this can happen until this matter is finalised and at the moment it is far from finalised because Leanne’s murderer is still undiscovered.

    Like

  3. Its very clear we need a Royal Commission or a Independent Coronial Inquest, this document clearly shows that the QPS has deliberately lied to the DPP and we need closure for both Leanne and Graham.

    Like

Leave a Reply to Sue McMullen Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s